Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144859

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorZabala García, José Ángel-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Paz, José M.-
dc.contributor.authorAlcon, Francisco-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Economía Aplicadaes
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-10T18:57:13Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-10T18:57:13Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-10-
dc.identifier.citationScience of The Total Environment, 768, 2021, 144859es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0048-9697-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1879-1026-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/139213-
dc.description©2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the Accepted, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Science of the Total Environment. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144859-
dc.description.abstractThe use of the ecosystem services approach for ecosystem management, including the valuation of ecosystem services, has grown in recent decades. Although a common framework is used, each ecosystem has its own characteristics. The agroecosystem, for example, is an anthropised ecosystem where ecosystem service flows are highly interrelated with the environment, positively or negatively. Therefore, agroecosystem services are usually accompanied by disservices. The valuation of agroecosystem services and disservices requires adaptation of existing ecosystem services paradigms to accommodate the innate agroecosystem idiosyncrasies. To this end, in this study, a comprehensive approach for valuation of agroecosystem services and disservices was proposed and validated in a semi-arid western Mediterranean agricultural area through stakeholder assessment, using a choice experiment. The results suggest that all categories of services (provisioning, regulating, and cultural) should be taken into account when valuing agroecosystem services and disservices. In particular, food provision (a provisioning service), water (a provisioning disservice), local climate regulation and biodiversity (regulating services), waste treatment and water purification (regulating disservices), and recreation and tourism (cultural services) are relevant for this purpose. Their relative importance in agroecosystems valuation reached 70% for agroecosystem services and 30% for disservices. Specifically, biodiversity (38%) emerged as the most relevant agroecosystem service to be valued, followed by recreation and tourism (20%), local climate regulation (7%), and food provision (5%). Among the agroecosystem disservices, water and waste treatment (15%), and water purification (15%) together contributed to 30% of the total importance. Agroecosystems should be valued considering their multifunctional character and the integration of agroecosystem services and disservices.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent43-
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relationThis work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation project [AGRISERVI: AGL2015-64411-R (MINECO/FEDER)] and the “Fundación Seneca – Región de Murcia” project (20912/PI/18). José A. Zabala acknowledges financial support received from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Personal Training (FPU 16/03473).es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAnthropised ecosystemses
dc.subjectChoice experimentes
dc.subjectMediterranean agroecosystemses
dc.subjectStakeholder assessmentes
dc.subjectHuman well-beinges
dc.titleA comprehensive approach for agroecosystem services and disservices valuationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144859-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Economía Aplicada

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Zabala et al 2021_STOTEN.pdf1,04 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons