Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12060562
Twittear
Título: | Ibuprofen Removal by Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide Coated Polysulfone Nanofiltration Membranes |
Fecha de publicación: | 28-may-2022 |
Editorial: | MDPI |
Cita bibliográfica: | Membranes 2022, 12(6), 562 |
ISSN: | Electrónico: 2077-0375 |
Materias relacionadas: | CDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::54 - Química |
Palabras clave: | Graphene oxide Ibuprofen Magnesium chloride Modified membranes Nanofiltration Reduced graphene oxide |
Resumen: | The presence of pharmaceutical products, and their metabolites, in wastewater has become a focus of growing environmental concern. Among these pharmaceutical products, ibuprofen (IBU) is one of the most consumed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and it can enter the environment though both human and animal consumption, because it is not entirely absorbed by the body, and the pharmaceutical industry wastewater. Nanofiltration has been described as an attractive process for the treatment of wastewater containing pharmaceutical products. In this paper, the modification of a polysulfone nanofiltration membrane by coating with graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) has been carried out. The morphology and elemental composition of the active layer of unmodified and modified membranes were analyzed by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), respectively. Initial characterization membranes was carried out, studying their water permeability coefficient and their permeate flux and rejection coefficients, at different applied pressures, using magnesium chloride solutions. The behavior of both pristine and coated membranes against ibuprofen solutions were analyzed by studying the permeate fluxes and the rejection coefficients at different pressures and at different contaminant concentrations. The results have shown that both GO and RGO coated membranes lead to higher values of ibuprofene rejection than that of uncoated membrane, the latter being the one that presents better results in the studies of permeability, selectivity, and fouling. |
Autor/es principal/es: | Hidalgo, A.M. Gómez, M. Murcia, M.D. León, G. Miguel, B. Gago, I. Martínez, P.M. |
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: | Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Ingeniería Química |
Versión del editor: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/12/6/562 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/138777 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12060562 |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Número páginas / Extensión: | 15 |
Derechos: | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Atribución 4.0 Internacional |
Descripción: | ©<2022>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ccby/4.0/ This document is the Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in [Membranes]. To access the final edited and published work see [https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12060562] |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos: Ingeniería Química |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
membranes-12-00562-v2.pdf | 1,08 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons