Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: DOI: 10.15644/asc51/2/4

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCortés, Olga-
dc.contributor.authorAlcaina, Antonia-
dc.contributor.authorBernabe, Antonia-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Físicaes
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-06T07:59:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-06T07:59:54Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationActa stomatologica Croatica, 2017;51(2):113-121.es
dc.identifier.issnPrint 0001-7019-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic 1846-0410-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/138690-
dc.description©<2017>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the, Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Acta Stomatilogica Croatica: International Journal of Oral Sciences and Dental Medicine. To access the final edited and published work see : https://doi.org/10.15644/asc51/2/4-
dc.description.abstractIn many cases, the indirect pulp treatment (IPT) is an acceptable treatment for deciduous teeth with reversible pulp inflammation. Various medicaments have been used for IPT, ranging from calcium hy- droxide and glass ionomers to dentin adhesives. Objective: This in vitro trial aimed to measure cyto- toxicity in a cell culture, comparing the following four adhesives: Xeno® V (XE), Excite® F DSC (EX), Adhese® OneF (AD) and Prime & Bond NT (PB). Materials and methods: The adhesives were pre- pared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 24 hours of exposure, the cell viability was evaluated using a photometrical test (MTT test). Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANO- VA). Results: Adhesives, the main component of which was 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), were found to be less cytotoxic, while those that included the monomer urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA were the most cytotoxic ) in their composition. The effects on cell viability assay varied be- tween the adhesives assayed with statistically significant differences. Conclusions: The results may support the argument that Adhese® OneF is the least cytotoxic of the adhesives assayed, and may be considered as an adhesive agent for indirect pulp treatment. However, Prime and Bond NT showed a reduced biocompatibility under the same conditions.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent9es
dc.languageenges
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectDentin Bonding Agentsen
dc.subjectCytotoxicityen
dc.subjectBiocompatibilityen
dc.subjectDental Pulp Cappingen
dc.titleBiocompatibility Evaluation of Four Dentin Adhesives Used as Indirect Pulp Capping Materialses
dc.title.alternativeProcjena biokompatibilnosti četiriju vrsta dentinskih adheziva kao sredstava za indirektno prekrivanje pulpe-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doiDOI: 10.15644/asc51/2/4-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
51-2-113-cortes.pdf330,58 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons