Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100979

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSicilia, María-
dc.contributor.authorPalazón, Mariola-
dc.contributor.authorLópez, Manuela-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Facultades de la UMU::Facultad de Economía y Empresaes
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T12:18:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T12:18:27Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationElectronic Commerce Research and Applications, 42, 100979es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/138637-
dc.description©2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the Accepted version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100979-
dc.description.abstractOn social media, individuals’ behavior can be affected as a result of either direct and intended recommendations by social media friends, or unintentional brand-related actions developed by social media friends. This study addresses the differences between intentional and unintentional influences by testing a model that delineates similarity and tie strength as drivers of influence, and purchase intention and social media engagement as the main outcomes. Based on the elaboration likelihood model, we analyze the underlying mechanism of unintentional influences versus intentional ones by comparing the role of source usefulness and information usefulness in the two influential processes. Results of two studies show that individuals can be unintentionally influenced by their social media friends, and the effect is similar to that from intentional influences. However, different mechanisms seem to be involved in the two influential processes. A central route of processing seems to be the mechanism underlying intentional influence, whereas both central and peripheral routes are used when the influence is unintentional.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent38es
dc.languageenges
dc.relationThis research was supported by the Fundación Ramón Areces under the XVI National Contest for the Adjudication of Aids to Research in Social Sciences.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectUnintentional influencees
dc.subjectSimilarity-
dc.subjectTie strength-
dc.subjectSource usefulness-
dc.subjectInformation usefulness-
dc.subjectELM-
dc.subjectPurchase intention-
dc.subjectSocial media engagement-
dc.titleIntentional vs. unintentional influences of social media friendses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100979-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Comercialización e Investigación de Mercados

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Sicilia et al., 2020.pdfArtículo1,02 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons