Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9321-8

Título: Virtue and arguers
Fecha de publicación: 2016
Editorial: Springer
Cita bibliográfica: Topoi 35, 441–450 (2016)
ISSN: 1572-8749
Palabras clave: Arguers
Argumentation
Ad hominem
Virtue
Resumen: Is a virtue approach in argumentation possible without committing the ad hominem fallacy? My answer is affirmative, provided that the object study of our theory is well delimited. My proposal is that a theory of argumentative virtue should not focus on argument appraisal, as has been assumed, but on those traits that make an individual achieve excellence in argumentative practices. An agent-based approach in argumentation should be developed, not in order to find better grounds for argument appraisal, but to gain insight into argumentative habits and excellence. This way we can benefit from what a virtue argumentation theory really has to offer.
Autor/es principal/es: Gascón, José Ángel
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: Filosofía
Versión del editor: The final publication is available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-015-9321-8
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/138483
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9321-8
Tipo de documento: info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
Número páginas / Extensión: 17
Derechos: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Descripción: ©<2016>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the Accepted, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Topoi. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9321-8
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Filosofía

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Topoi2016.pdf229,65 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons