Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11228
Twittear
Título: | Validity and reliability of Veloflex to measure active cervical range of motion in healthy participants |
Fecha de publicación: | 5-abr-2021 |
Fecha de defensa / creación: | 23-nov-2020 |
Editorial: | Peer J |
Cita bibliográfica: | Peer J, Vol: 9, e11228, 2021 |
ISSN: | 2167-8359 |
Materias relacionadas: | CDU::62 - Ingeniería. Tecnología |
Palabras clave: | Cervical Range of motion Validity/reliability Optoelectronic device |
Resumen: | Background Neck pain has a high annual incidence and decreases the cervical active range of motion (ROM). Clinicians use various methods to evaluate cervical range of motion (CROM) that some of them have also been proposed to give instant feedback. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of Veloflex (VF) to measure the CROM by comparison with the cervical range of motion (CROM) device, and to examine their test-retest reliability. Methods Thirty-eight healthy and 20 symptomatic participants were evaluated. Cervical flexion-extension, side bending, and rotations were tested in two sessions, first by the CROM and VF and in the second only with the VF. To evaluate the concurrent validity and agreement between CROM and VF, Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ) and Bland–Altmann plots were used. Reliability were evaluated using intra-class correlation (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results CROM and VF showed excellent correlation for all movements ( r > 0.960). Both devices provided small mean ‘bias’ (≤1.29%) in all movements regarding CROM measures. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the VF was excellent (ICC > 0.98). SEMs ranging from 0.72% to 2.38% and the MDC ranging from 1.22° to 2.60° in all participants. The results support the validity and reliability of VF to measure CROM. For its use, with a basic training is enough to get reliable measurements. |
Autor/es principal/es: | Cánovas Ambit, Germán García Vidal, José A. Martín San Agustín, Rodrigo Arenas Dalla Vecchia, Aurelio Sánchez Barbadora, Mariana Medina Mirapeix, Francesc |
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: | Facultad de Química, Departamento de Electromagnetismo y Electrónica |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/138355 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11228 |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Número páginas / Extensión: | 15 |
Derechos: | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
Descripción: | ©2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in PeerJ – the Journal of Life & Environmental Sciences. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11228 |
Matería temporal: | Siglo XXI |
Matería geográfica: | Laboratorio clínico |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos: Electromagnetismo y Electrónica |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Measuring active cervical range of motion.pdf | Validación Veloflex cervical | 5,73 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons