Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.08.004

Título: Application of a score for evaluation of pain, distress and discomfort in pigs with lameness and prolapses: correlation with saliva biomarkers and severity of the disease
Fecha de publicación: oct-2019
Cita bibliográfica: Research in Veterinary Science (2019), 126, 155–163
ISSN: 0034-5288
1532-2661
Materias relacionadas: CDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::63 - Agricultura. Silvicultura. Zootecnia. Caza. Pesca::636 - Veterinaria. Explotación y cría de animales. Cría del ganado y de animales domésticos
Palabras clave: Biomarkers
Pain
Pig
Saliva
Score
Resumen: A score system was used to evaluate pain, distress and discomfort in healthy pigs and pigs with two different diseases: lameness and rectal prolapse. In addition, correlations between the results of this score and a panel of salivary biomarkers and severity of disease were studied. This panel included biomarkers of stress (cortisol, salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), total esterase activity (TEA), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) and lipase (Lip)), im- munity (adenosine deaminase isozymes 1 (ADA1) and 2 (ADA2)) and oxidative status (uric acid (UA), Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), ferric reducing ability of saliva (FRAS), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)). Based on their score, diseased animals were subdivided in those without and with evident pain. Lame pigs and prolapsed pigs with pain showed higher salivary levels of cortisol, sAA, TEA, BChE, ADA1 and ADA2 compared with the healthy pigs. In addition, the prolapsed pigs with pain showed higher levels of FRAS, AOPP and H2O2 compared with the healthy animals. Salivary cortisol, TEA, BChE, ADA isozymes 1 and 2, FRAS and AOPP correlated with the pain score. This five-point pain score system can be easily applied to lame and prolapsed pigs, and salivary bio- markers could be used as an additional tool for pain assessment in those pigs.
Autor/es principal/es: Contreras Aguilar, María Dolores
Escribano Tortosa, Damián
Martínez Miró, Silvia
López Arjona, Marina
Peres Rubio, Camila
Martínez Subiela, Silvia
Cerón Madrigal, José Joaquín
Tecles Vicente, Fernando
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Medicina y Cirugía Animal
Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Producción Animal
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/138248
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.08.004
Tipo de documento: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Número páginas / Extensión: 9
Derechos: info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Descripción: ©2019. This document is the Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Research in Veterinary Science. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.08.004
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Medicina y Cirugía Animal



Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.