Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: An Empirical Approach to Defining Treatment Response and Remission in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Abstract

Objective: A lack of universal definitions for response and remission in pediatric obsessive- compulsive disorder (OCD) has hampered the comparability of results across trials. To address this problem, we conducted an individual participant data diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis to evaluate the discriminative ability of the Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) in determining response and remission. We also aimed to generate empirically derived cutoffs on the CY-BOCS for these outcomes. Method: A systematic review of PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and CENTRAL identified 5,401 references, 42 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were considered eligible and 21 provided data for inclusion (N 1,234). A score ≤ 2 in the Clinical Global Impressions Improvement and Severity scales were chosen to define response and remission, respectively. A two-stage random-effects meta-analysis model was established. The area under the curve (AUC) and the Youden Index were computed to indicate the discriminative ability of the CY-BOCS and to guide for the optimal cutoff, respectively. Results: The CY-BOCS had sufficient discriminative ability to determine response (AUC 0.89) and remission (AUC 0.92). The optimal cutoff for response was a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline to posttreatment (sensitivity [95% CI] 83.9 [83.7, 84.1]; specificity [95% CI] 81.7 [81.5, 81.9]). The optimal cutoff for remission was a posttreatment raw score ≤ 12 (sensitivity [95% CI] 82.0 [81.8, 82.2]; specificity [95% CI] 84.6 [84.4, 84.8]). Conclusion: Meta-analysis identified empirically optimal cutoffs on the CY-BOCS to determine response and remission in pediatric OCD RCTs. Systematic adoption of standardized operational definitions for response and remission will improve comparability across trials for pediatric OCD.