Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/137182

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRuzafa Martínez, María-
dc.contributor.authorFernández Salazar, Serafín-
dc.contributor.authorLeal Costa, César-
dc.contributor.authorRamos Morcillo, Antonio Jesús-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Enfermeríaes
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-11T11:42:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-11T11:42:19Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationWorldviews on Evidence-based Nursing, 2020; 17:5, 366–375es
dc.identifier.issn1545-102X-
dc.identifier.issn1741-6787-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/137182-
dc.description©2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the Accepted version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Worldviews on Evidence-based Nursing.es
dc.description.abstractBackground: The availability of valid and reliable instruments, based on current competency frameworks, is essential to respond to the need for accurate measurement of the competency of registered nurses in evidence-based practice (EBP). Aims: To develop and validate a questionnaire capable of measuring EBP competencies in registered nurses following the competency framework developed by Melynk et al. (2014). Methods: The study was developed in two stages: (a) creation of the questionnaire based on an operational definition of the construct, its face, and content validation by 10 experts, and cognitive piloting; (b) psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire by a cross-sectional, and multicenter study between February and November 2018. Analyses were conducted of the questionnaire’s reliability and construct validity (exploratory [EFA] and confirmatory [CFA] fac tor analyses). Results: First phase: The initial version of EBP-COQ© Prof contained 50 items grouped into four dimensions (attitudes, knowledge, skills, and utilization). After two expert validation rounds, a 35-item version was obtained with content validity index of 0.86. Second phase: The questionnaire was completed by 579 nurses; EFA with PROMAX rotation revealed that the four factor model had the best fit (χ2 = 311.32; p = .001, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.000, 90% confidence interval [CI] = 0.000 – 0.010; comparative fit index [CFI] = 1), and it showed a good CFA fit index: CFI = 0.932, and RMSEA = 0.093 (90% CI = 0.097 − 0.108). Cronbach’s α for each factor ranged from 0.817 (factor III) to 0.948 (factor II). Linking Evidence to Action: EBP-COQ Prof© is a valid, reliable, and easily administered ques tionnaire that measures the self-perceived competency of registered nurses in EBP based on an updated and specific competency framework. It permits the independent evaluation of at titudes, knowledge, and skills related to EBP and of its utilization in hospital and primary care settings, allowing the monitoring of compliance with EBPes
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent10es
dc.languageenges
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEvidence-based practicees
dc.subjectValidationes
dc.subjectCompetencyes
dc.subjectNursees
dc.subjectInstrument developmentes
dc.subjectQuestionnairees
dc.titleQuestionnaire to Evaluate the Competency in Evidence-Based Practice of Registered Nurses (EBP-COQ Prof©): Development and Psychometric Validationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Enfermería

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Questionnaire to Evaluate (aceptada).pdf637,41 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons