Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0399

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPino Ortega, José-
dc.contributor.authorHernández Belmonte, Alejandro-
dc.contributor.authorGómez Carmona, Carlos David-
dc.contributor.authorBastida Castillo, Alejandro-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Rubio, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorIbañez, Sergio José-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T10:11:41Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-29T10:11:41Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-18-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Sport Rehabilitation vol. 29, nº 6, p.p. 738-747es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 1056-6716-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1543-3072-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/102179-
dc.description© 2019 Human Kinetics, Inc. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. This document is the Accepted version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0399-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aims of the present study were: (i) to describe the FFT multi-joint as monopodal postural stability measurement in well-trained athletes, (ii) to compare the withinsubject FTT between laterality, joints and body segments, and (iii) to establish the within and between-subject relationship between joints. Methods: Twelve national-level basketball players participated voluntarily in this investigation. The participants performed two 60-second repetitions of a monopodal stability test (one repetition with each lower limb), separated by three minutes of active recovery. All tests were recorded by four WIMU PROTM inertial devices located on the ankle, knee, lumbar spine and thoracic spine. The main variable was total acceleration (AcelT), where the Fourier Transform (FFT) was applied. Results: The higher instability results were found in the ankle and in the non-dominant lower limb (dominant=1.136±0.81 a.u.; non-dominant=1.169±.108 a.u.). In the body segment analysis, the greater percentage of differences (%diff) were shown between lumbar spine and knee in the dominant (%diff=-2.989%; d=0.87) and non-dominant lower limb (%diff=-3.243%; d=0.90). Finally, great between-subjects variability was found in all joints and body segments. Conclusions: The described protocol is proposed for monopodal postural stability assessment, being useful to provide information about the stability of joints and the body segment between joints. Besides, a within-subject analysis is recommended and the FFT calculation will enable a linear analysis of each test .-
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent29-
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics-
dc.relationThe author Carlos D. Gómez Carmona was supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (FPU17/00407). This study was cofunded by the Regional Department of Economy and Infrastructure of the Government of Extremadura (Spain) and the European Social Fund (dossier number: GR15122).-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBalance-
dc.subjectPostural control-
dc.subjectAccelerometers-
dc.subjectSport-
dc.titleMonopodal postural stability assessment by wireless inertial measurement units through the fast fourier transformes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jsr/29/6/article-p738.xml-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0399-
dc.contributor.departmentActividad Física y del Deporte-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
CV201910me..f.pdf574,46 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons