Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2620-x
Twittear
Título: | Effects of topical applications of porcine acellular urinary bladder matrix and Centella asiatica extract on oral wound healing in a rat model |
Fecha de publicación: | 24-sep-2018 |
Editorial: | Springer Heidelberg |
Cita bibliográfica: | Clinical Oral Investigations 2019; 23(5):2083-2095 |
ISSN: | Print: 1432-6981 Electronic: 1436-3771 |
Materias relacionadas: | CDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales |
Palabras clave: | Porcine acellular urinary bladder matrix Centella asiatica extract Wound healing Oral Mucosa Rat model |
Resumen: | Objectives To evaluate the effects of topical applications of porcine acellular urinary bladder matrix (AUBM) and Centella asiatica extract (CAE) on the healing of tongue wounds in a rat model. Materials and methods Wounds were made in the tongue using a punch tool in 64 male Sprague-Dawley rats, randomized into four groups (n = 16 per group): group 1 (control), group 2 (CAE), group 3 (AUBM mixed with orabase), and group 4 (orabase). No product was applied in group 1 and groups 2–4 received three daily topical applications. The animals were weighed on day 0 and at the time of euthanasia. Four rats in each group were euthanized at days 2, 7, 14, and 21 and the tongues were processed for: macroscopic morphometric analysis, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, histological wound repair (degree of reepithelialization and inflammation), and CD31 positivity. Results The animals’ weight gain, histological wound repair, and CD31 positivity from greatest to least were: AUBM > CAE > orabase > control. Percentage of tongue occupied by wound, MPO, and MPA levels from least to greatest were: AUBM < CAE < orabase < control, whereby the AUBM group showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in comparison with the other groups on days 2, 7, 14, and 21 for percentage of tongue occupied by wound and MDA and on days 7, 14, and 21 for MPO. Conclusions CAE is effective for oral tissue regeneration, while AUBM is an even more potent means of oral mucosa regeneration. Clinical relevance AUBM may be beneficial to patients with oral wounds; this finding requires further clinical and laboratory investigation. |
Autor/es principal/es: | Camacho Alonso, Fabio Torralba Ruiz, M.R. García Carrillo, N. Lacal Luján, J. Martínez Díaz, F. Sánchez Siles, M. |
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: | Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/138307 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2620-x |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Número páginas / Extensión: | 13 |
Derechos: | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
Descripción: | © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Clinical Oral Investigations. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2620-x |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos: Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s00784-018-2620-x.2019A (9).pdf | 6,34 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir Solicitar una copia |
Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.