Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100786
Twittear
Título: | Feedback literacy in writing research and teaching: Advancing L2 WCF research agendas. |
Fecha de publicación: | 26-sep-2023 |
Cita bibliográfica: | Assessing Writing, 58, 100786, |
ISSN: | Print: 1075-2935 Electronic: 1873-5916 |
Materias relacionadas: | CDU::8- Lingüística y literatura::81 - Lingüística y lenguas |
Palabras clave: | Feedback literacy Written corrective feedback L2 writing Second language acquisition Individual differences Writing experience |
Resumen: | Research on corrective feedback (CF) has developed from its original focus on identifying which type of CF is most effective for developing L2 language learners’ grammatical accuracy to focusing on how learners use CF. Underpinning this is the assumption that learners know what to do with CF when they receive it. The concept of “feedback literacy” challenges this assumption. Carless and Boud (2018), define feedback literacy as “the understandings, capacities and dispositions needed to make sense of information and use it to enhance work or learning strategies” (p. 1316). Our intention in this paper is to reflect on the manner in which theoretical and empirical work on feedback literacy can contribute to advancing L2 written corrective feedback (WCF) research agendas. Central in our proposal is the partially under-researched aspect of experience in terms of the L2 writers’ educational background experience, particularly experience with L1 and L2 writing. We further argue that how learners were taught L1 writing and how the L1 educational culture/ society values writing can impact on how learners approach L2 writing tasks and accompanying feedback. Implications of this inclusive view of the learner for future research and pedagogy is discussed. |
Autor/es principal/es: | Boggs, Jill Manchón, Rosa M. |
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: | Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Filología Inglesa |
Versión del editor: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523000946?via%3Dihub |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/137718 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100786 |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Número páginas / Extensión: | 30 |
Derechos: | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAcess Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
Descripción: | ©2023. "Once the embargo has passed this document Will be available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.” This document is the Accepted version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Assessing Writing. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100786 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos: Filología Inglesa |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Boggs & Manchón 2023_Assessing Writing_Versión aceptada.pdf | 838,84 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir Solicitar una copia |
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons