Publication: Self-directed learning in nursing students: a quasi-experimental comparison of two simulation methods
| dc.contributor.author | Molina Rodríguez, Alonso | |
| dc.contributor.author | Díaz Agea, José Luis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Su-Fen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lopez-Chicheri-García, Isabel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Suárez Cortés, María | |
| dc.contributor.author | Doménech Asensi, Guillermo | |
| dc.contributor.department | Enfermería | |
| dc.contributor.other | Facultad de Enfermería | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-08T11:58:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-08T11:58:20Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | © 2025 The Authors | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-09-24 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Nursing is a dynamic profession requiring self-motivated professionals capable of continually updating their knowledge and skills. Self-directed learning (SDL) is essential to meet evolving clinical demands, and simulation provides innovative approaches to promote it Aim: To examinewhether theSelf-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES ) enhances SDL skills in nursing students compared with traditional high-fidelity simulation. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 109 undergraduate nursing students. The intervention group (n = 49) applied MAES, where students defined objectives, designed scenarios, and identified resources tailored to their needs. The control group (n = 60) participated in a traditional high-fidelity simulation. SDL ability was assessed with the Self-Directed Learning Instrument (SDLI) at baseline and postintervention. Results: Intra-group analysis showed significant improvement in the MAES group (p = 0.014) compared with the traditional group (p = 0.088). However, between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences (p = 0.157). The most improved dimensions were self-control (time and effort management) and interpersonal communication. Conclusions: MAES shows a favorable trend in fostering SDL, suggesting its potential as an effective educational strategy in nursing. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.format.extent | 8 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Teaching and Learning in Nursing 21 (2026) e153 e160 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2025.08.032 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1557-2013 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1557-3087 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/184592 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation | Sin financiación externa a la Universidad | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725002653?via%3Dihub | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Clinical simulation | |
| dc.subject | MAES method | |
| dc.subject | Nursing education | |
| dc.subject | Critical thinking | |
| dc.subject | Motivation | |
| dc.subject | Self-directed learning | |
| dc.subject.ods | No relacionado con ningún objetivo de desarrollo sostenible | |
| dc.title | Self-directed learning in nursing students: a quasi-experimental comparison of two simulation methods | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | es |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | b7664a93-2053-4383-a326-6b8c825bf8d5 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | d807982a-83e0-478c-822c-4d6f604047c0 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 104132c6-be26-4944-bc5b-e1b7e50f5c66 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 54f45f2c-f61a-4040-84cc-b2241c8d50ad | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | b7664a93-2053-4383-a326-6b8c825bf8d5 |
Collections
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/