Publication: Historia, subjetividad y ficción. A propósito de Pasados singulares de Enzo Traverso.
Authors
Ruiz Torres, Pedro
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Ateneo de Estudios Políticos (ACEP)
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
A lo largo de este texto se analiza y contextualiza la obra Pasados singulares de Enzo Traverso. Especialmente las formas en las que, desde aquella, se analiza el giro subjetivista en la historiografía contemporánea, marcado por la incorporación del "yo" en la narración histórica. El autor relaciona este fenómeno con el presentismo y el neoliberalismo, destacando la privatización de la memoria y la atrofia de la imaginación utópica. Sin embargo, Traverso advierte que esta nueva escritura no debe reducirse al ámbito íntimo, sino integrar las experiencias individuales en un contexto histórico más amplio. El actual texto ofrece una lectura de un análisis crítico y estimulante que invita al debate sobre la transformación en la manera de escribir la historia en las últimas décadas.
Abstract: This text analyzes and contextualizes Singular Pasts by Enzo Traverso, focusing on how it examines the subjective turn in contemporary historiography, characterized by the introduction of the "I" in historical narration. Traverso associates this phenomenon with presentism and neoliberalism, highlighting the privatization of memory and the atrophy of utopian imagination. However, he warns that this new form of writing should not be limited to the intimate but should integrate individual experiences within a broader historical framework. The essay offers a critical and provocative analysis, encouraging debate about the transformation of historical writing in recent decades.
Abstract: This text analyzes and contextualizes Singular Pasts by Enzo Traverso, focusing on how it examines the subjective turn in contemporary historiography, characterized by the introduction of the "I" in historical narration. Traverso associates this phenomenon with presentism and neoliberalism, highlighting the privatization of memory and the atrophy of utopian imagination. However, he warns that this new form of writing should not be limited to the intimate but should integrate individual experiences within a broader historical framework. The essay offers a critical and provocative analysis, encouraging debate about the transformation of historical writing in recent decades.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Pensamiento al margen: revista digital de ideas políticas, n. 21, 2025, p. 78-90.
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/