Publication: Libre circulación transfronteriza del laudo arbitral y orden público internacional
Authors
Noriega Linares, Carmen María
item.page.secondaryauthor
Escuelas::Escuela Internacional de Doctorado
item.page.director
Carrascosa González, Javier
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
Description
Abstract
A medida que el comercio internacional se expande y el número de participantes aumenta, también surgen más conflictos que deben ser solucionados. En este escenario aparece el arbitraje comercial internacional como el método de solución de controversias más adecuado, pues se escapa de los intereses nacionales para responder al de los particulares.
El laudo arbitral, fruto del procedimiento, constituye la resolución que ha puesto fin al litigio entre las partes. Sin embargo, ¿ahí acaba todo? La parte vencedora querrá hacer valer ese título ejecutivo en los distintos Estados en los que tenga algún interés y, para ello, solicitará el exequátur del laudo. Frente a esta solicitud establece el art. V del Convenio de Nueva York varios motivos que pueden oponerse para solicitar que se deniegue su reconocimiento y exequátur, algunos de los cuales son apreciables de oficio. Y es en este contexto que el orden público internacional cobra mayor relevancia, pues será el último filtro apreciable de oficio capaz de denegar la entrada de los laudos arbitrales dictados en el extranjero dentro del orden jurídico de cada Estado.
De este modo, el orden público internacional protegerá los intereses sociales de cada Estado, de manera que la sociedad no tenga que enfrentarse a situaciones que perturben su moral, costumbres o principios generales.
A través del estudio y análisis de la ley, la doctrina y la jurisprudencia, se han analizado una serie de supuestos que pueden activar la excepción de orden público internacional y evitar la introducción de un laudo extranjero en el orden estatal. De este modo, se ha plasmado en este trabajo cómo la doctrina y la jurisprudencia interpretan lo dispuesto por la ley y cómo las circunstancias particulares de cada caso pueden afectar o no a la activación del orden público internacional.
As international commerce expands and the number of participants increases, more disputes arise and need to be resolved. In this scenario, international commercial arbitration appears as the most appropriate method of dispute settlement, as it escapes from national interests to respond to the interests of individuals. The arbitration award, the result of the arbitral procedure, constitutes the decision that has put an end to the dispute between the parties. However, is that the end of the problem? The successful party will want to enforce this enforceable title in the various States in which it has an interest and, to this end, will request for the exequatur of the award. The article V of the New York Convention Article V of the New York Convention establishes several grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement of the award, some of which can be assessed by the judge. And it is in this context that international public policy takes on greater relevance, as it will be the last filter that can be evaluated ex officio, capable of denying the entry of arbitral awards rendered abroad into the legal order of each State. In this way, international public policy will protect the social interests of each State, so that society does not have to face situations that disturb its morals, customs or general principles. Through the study and analysis of the law, doctrine and jurisprudence, a series of cases that can activate the exception of international public order and prevent the introduction of a foreign award in the state order have been analysed. In this way, this work has shown how the doctrine and case law interpret the provisions of the law and how the particular circumstances of each case may or may not affect the activation of international public policy.
As international commerce expands and the number of participants increases, more disputes arise and need to be resolved. In this scenario, international commercial arbitration appears as the most appropriate method of dispute settlement, as it escapes from national interests to respond to the interests of individuals. The arbitration award, the result of the arbitral procedure, constitutes the decision that has put an end to the dispute between the parties. However, is that the end of the problem? The successful party will want to enforce this enforceable title in the various States in which it has an interest and, to this end, will request for the exequatur of the award. The article V of the New York Convention Article V of the New York Convention establishes several grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement of the award, some of which can be assessed by the judge. And it is in this context that international public policy takes on greater relevance, as it will be the last filter that can be evaluated ex officio, capable of denying the entry of arbitral awards rendered abroad into the legal order of each State. In this way, international public policy will protect the social interests of each State, so that society does not have to face situations that disturb its morals, customs or general principles. Through the study and analysis of the law, doctrine and jurisprudence, a series of cases that can activate the exception of international public order and prevent the introduction of a foreign award in the state order have been analysed. In this way, this work has shown how the doctrine and case law interpret the provisions of the law and how the particular circumstances of each case may or may not affect the activation of international public policy.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.