Publication:
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLópez López, Mirian
dc.contributor.authorLeón Muñoz, Vicente Jesús
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Martínez, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorSantonja Medina, Fernando
dc.contributor.departmentCirugía, Pediatría y Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-08T11:10:27Z
dc.date.available2025-05-08T11:10:27Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-10
dc.description© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. This document is the Accepted version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Expert Review of Medical Devices. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2019.1627197
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. During the past decade, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been commercially introduced in order to simplify and make TKA surgery more effective, precise and efficient than conventional mechanical instrumentation (CI) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS). Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against PSI for routine use. The aim of the current manuscript is to describe advantages and limitations of PSI for primary TKA. Areas covered: By means of a description of the available literature different aspects are discussed (accuracy, clinical and functional outcomes, operative time, blood loss, efficiency and costs). Expert opinion: Most publications do not claim a significant increase in PSI accuracy over CI, but they also do not postulate PSIs accuracy is worse either. Regarding clinical aspects, PSI did not appear to give any advantage over standard techniques although, equally, it did not appear to show any disadvantages. PSI seems to reduce operative time, could reduce perioperative blood loss and provides logistical benefits in the operation room. Further studies will be required to more thoroughly assess all the advantages and disadvantages of this promising technology as an alternative to CI and CAS.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent14es
dc.identifier.citationExpert Review of Medical Devices, 16(7), 555–567
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2019.1627197
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 1743-4440
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1745-2422
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/154296
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group, Taylor and Francis
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17434440.2019.1627197
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPatient-specific instrumentation (PSI)es
dc.subjectTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA)es
dc.subjectTotal knee replacement (TKR)es
dc.subjectKnee
dc.titlePatient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplastyes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublication04fa6a27-b7f7-4a00-b589-5900e75a5e66
relation.isAuthorOfPublication58346844-4dff-49b7-9181-9f1d05c266ca
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7bb6114e-b685-4aae-b8bb-4a4d04f191c6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery04fa6a27-b7f7-4a00-b589-5900e75a5e66
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.pdf
Size:
1.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos