Publication: Larga vida a la tragedia: ensayo sobre la tragedia y la revolución
Authors
Ramos Colás, Álvaro
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon/296891
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
En este ensayo se intenta explorar la relación entre tragedia, política y revolución, en especial los aportes de la escuela culturalista británica. En respuesta a la tesis de la muerte de la tragedia (sostenida por Steiner, entre otros), Raymond Williams defiende la necesidad de la revolución como arma política y la importancia de la tragedia para su consecución. Terry Eagleton asume la necesidad de la revolución y la importancia de la tragedia, pero recurre a las categorías lacanianas para marcar diferencias con su maestro Williams. Clark aporta una visión personal y crítica respecto a ambos.
In this essay, I explore the relation between tragedy, politics and revolution, specially through the British culturalist thought. Raymond Williams, responding the death of the tragedy thesis (Steiner among others), defends the necessity of revolution as a political means, and the importance of tragedy to carry it out. Terry Eagleton assumes the necessity of revolution and the importance of tragedy, but disagree with him about his humanist optimism. The turn Eagleton proposes is based upon the three lacanian cate- gories. Clark’s position lays somewhere between Williams and Eagleton, since he is able to sustain a critical approach to both.
In this essay, I explore the relation between tragedy, politics and revolution, specially through the British culturalist thought. Raymond Williams, responding the death of the tragedy thesis (Steiner among others), defends the necessity of revolution as a political means, and the importance of tragedy to carry it out. Terry Eagleton assumes the necessity of revolution and the importance of tragedy, but disagree with him about his humanist optimism. The turn Eagleton proposes is based upon the three lacanian cate- gories. Clark’s position lays somewhere between Williams and Eagleton, since he is able to sustain a critical approach to both.
publication.page.subject
Tragedia , Revolución , Marxismo , Modernidad , Tragedy , Politics , Revolution , Ethics , Marxism , Modernity
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, núm. 44, 2019, pp. 121-134
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. htttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/