Publication: Alcance y significado del consentimiento en las técnicas de reproducción humana asistida
Authors
Álvarez Sarabia, Marina
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Murcia: Universidad de Murcia, Editum
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La Ley 14/2006, de 26 de mayo, sobre Técnicas de Reproducción
Humana Asistida posibilita la aplicación de diversas técnicas reproductivas a aquellas
usuarias que cumplan con los requisitos prescritos, con el fin de facilitar una concepción
que de forma natural no se ha conseguido. Uno de los aspectos más destacados de estas
técnicas son los consentimientos que tanto la usuaria como otros sujetos que recoge la
Ley, deben otorgar para la correcta aplicación y efectos de las técnicas; de ella se infiere
la necesidad, o posibilidad, de la manifestación de la voluntad tanto de la mujer
receptora como de su pareja. Este consentimiento tendrá dos finalidades principalmente:
en primer lugar, la autorización de la intromisión en el propio cuerpo para obtener el
material genético preciso para la aplicación de las técnicas, en caso de tratarse de
fecundación homóloga; en segundo lugar, aceptar la consecuencia de la determinación
de la filiación obtenida mediante reproducción asistida, sea homóloga o heteróloga. La
ausencia de este consentimiento ha planteado numerosos problemas doctrinales ante la
falta de una regulación más específica por parte de la Ley y una todavía escasa
jurisprudencia. Las principales discusiones se centran en la preponderancia de la
voluntad, principio inspirador de la LTRHA, o del elemento genético, fundamento de la
filiación en el Código Civil.
The Act 14/2006, from May 26th, on Assisted Human Procreation makes possible the application of many procreation techniques to every woman that meets fixed criteria, in order to make possible conception that cannot take place naturally. One of the main respects about these techniques is user’s consent, as, according to this Law, it has to be given for these procedures’ correct development and their effects; this shows that consent has to be given by the female user and her partner. This permission has two aims: firstly, the authorization to get gametes for assisted procreation when fertilization is carried out with the couple’s gametes and, secondly, the acceptance of filiations-related consequences, whether the fertilization is done with a donor’s gametes or the own couple’s gametes. However, there are numerous problems in relation to those cases where there is a lack of consent due to the absence of a more specific regulation of this respect by the Law and the shortage of jurisprudence on this matter. Part of the doctrine and Assisted Human Procreation Law Marina Álvarez Sarabia defend the preponderance of wishes whilst the other part of the doctrine and the Civil Code defend the preponderance of genetic coincidence.
The Act 14/2006, from May 26th, on Assisted Human Procreation makes possible the application of many procreation techniques to every woman that meets fixed criteria, in order to make possible conception that cannot take place naturally. One of the main respects about these techniques is user’s consent, as, according to this Law, it has to be given for these procedures’ correct development and their effects; this shows that consent has to be given by the female user and her partner. This permission has two aims: firstly, the authorization to get gametes for assisted procreation when fertilization is carried out with the couple’s gametes and, secondly, the acceptance of filiations-related consequences, whether the fertilization is done with a donor’s gametes or the own couple’s gametes. However, there are numerous problems in relation to those cases where there is a lack of consent due to the absence of a more specific regulation of this respect by the Law and the shortage of jurisprudence on this matter. Part of the doctrine and Assisted Human Procreation Law Marina Álvarez Sarabia defend the preponderance of wishes whilst the other part of the doctrine and the Civil Code defend the preponderance of genetic coincidence.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.