Publication: El TEDH y la delimitación del secreto de las comunicaciones: un caso de recepción revisable.
Authors
Ocón García, Juan
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/analesderecho.452711
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Convenio de Roma y Constitución española garantizan la inmunidad de espacios
comunes de disfrute de derechos. Sin embargo, esta protección se lleva a cabo a través de
normas de objeto disímil: tal es el caso, entre otros, de los arts. 8 CEDH y 18 CE.
La disparidad de objetos protegidos condiciona al Tribunal Constitucional quien, por
mandato constitucional (10.2 CE), debe interpretar los derechos fundamentales de conformidad
con instrumentos internacionales, entre los que indiscutidamente se encuentra el CEDH.
Se analiza la doctrina del TEDH y su integración por el TC en la delimitación del
derecho fundamental al secreto de las comunicaciones.
Se sugiere una revisión de la recepción practicada para la interpretación del art. 18.3
CE en dos aspectos: la protección de las comunicaciones finalizadas y de las conversaciones
directas.
The Rome Convention and the Spanish Constitution declare rights that seek to guarantee the immunity of common spaces for the enjoyment of rights. However, this protection is carried out through norms whose objects are not homogeneous: such is the case, among others, of arts. 8 ECHR and 18 CE. This difference of protected objects conditions the Constitutional Court that, by constitutional mandate (10.2 CE), must interpret fundamental rights in accordance with international instruments, among which is undoubtedly the ECHR. This paper analyzes the doctrine of the ECtHR and the way of integration practiced by the TC in the delimitation of the fundamental right to the secrecy of communications. In this sense, it is suggested that the reception of the doctrine of the ECtHR for the interpretation of art. 18.3 CE should perhaps undergo review in two aspects: the protection of completed communications and direct conversations.
The Rome Convention and the Spanish Constitution declare rights that seek to guarantee the immunity of common spaces for the enjoyment of rights. However, this protection is carried out through norms whose objects are not homogeneous: such is the case, among others, of arts. 8 ECHR and 18 CE. This difference of protected objects conditions the Constitutional Court that, by constitutional mandate (10.2 CE), must interpret fundamental rights in accordance with international instruments, among which is undoubtedly the ECHR. This paper analyzes the doctrine of the ECtHR and the way of integration practiced by the TC in the delimitation of the fundamental right to the secrecy of communications. In this sense, it is suggested that the reception of the doctrine of the ECtHR for the interpretation of art. 18.3 CE should perhaps undergo review in two aspects: the protection of completed communications and direct conversations.
Citation
Anales de Derecho, Nº Especial, 2020
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/