Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1345677

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMonroy Hernández, Fuensanta-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Geraldo, José L.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T11:40:35Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-15T11:40:35Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-30-
dc.identifier.citationEducational Studies Volume 44, 2018 - Issue 1es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0305-5698-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1465-3400-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/148457-
dc.description© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. This document is the Accepted version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Educational Studies. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1345677es
dc.description.abstractThis study is framed under the student approaches to learning tradition. The aim was to identify convergence in quantitative and qualitative responses of individuals when measuring their conceptions of and approaches to learning with a mixed methods design. A sample of 1110 Spanish Master’s level teacher education students completed a scale on approaches to learning (R-SPQ-2F), and a randomly selected subsample of 111 answered an open-ended question on how they learned. Overall, the qualitative and quantitative data did not support each other, as inventory responses showed a clear predominance of a deep, non-surface approach to learning, whereas qualitative answers reflected a tendency towards lower-order conceptions of learning. Inconsistencies in the results suggest future research ought to use a combination of techniques when exploring constructs such as learning should they wish to draw valid conclusions.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent18es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group, Routledgees
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectLearninges
dc.subjectLearning conceptionses
dc.subjectLearning approacheses
dc.subjectApproaches to learninges
dc.subjectTeacher educationes
dc.subjectPre-service teacheres
dc.titleMeasuring learning: discrepancies between conceptions of and approaches to learninges
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03055698.2017.1345677es
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1345677-
dc.contributor.departmentMétodos de Investigación y Diagnóstico en Educación-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos



Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons